| Platform | GameSpot | Metacritic / User Score |
|---|---|---|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 prepares to invade New York in this video review.
1 Like The Call of Duty games would be much better off if they had LONGER single-player campaigns.
I mean, with 4-5 hour campaigns, why do they even bother putting it in at all?
If they don't care, just make the CoD games multiplayer-only games, since that seems to be what everyone cares about these days.
I really want to play the CoD games, but I'm not into multiplayer at all, so it doesn't feel worth it to waste my money on the games with 4-5 hour campaigns.
Too bad.
I can't wait for it to come out, because my Video Game Battle Suit is ready for some real action, this suits feels it all. It @ the Bey-Tech web-site, you need to check it out:)
So Bring It On:)
Worst of the series. Worth about a 6 imo. I still have high hopes for Black Ops 2, though.
MW3 has its ups and downs, but I really like it that Treyarch is pushing Black Ops 2 to its limits. The weapons and perks have been perfectly balanced, just check out http://www.blackopsii.com/ and see it yourself, it?s totally different from MW3. The fact that MW4 is coming out next year should be really interesting in how are they going to improve it when compared to BO2.
lol how people criticize the cod franchise on forums and video reviews but have all bought the game and are watching the review?
Still dont understand how this crap got 88/100
good thing users arent as blind than critics
6.9/10 is perfect score for this crap
All military FPS that come out today are crap. These games are no longer good videogame art, just corporate garbage for adhd retards. MW3 was the worst game of the MW series, black ops is a little better.
Easily the second best in the Call of Duty franchise, just behind the masterpiece that was Black Ops
Blow me Chris Watters! For not talking about all the software glitches. Your bought and paid for, aren't you man! Kiss ass!
Gamespot always talks to much about the Single Player in FPS games >.<
and why didnt this game get the "Same As Last Year" achievement? cuz its exactly the same shit they released like 2 years ago. This game is also for casuals only, just run and gun not much skill at all. The games engine is 7 years old and they will also use it for COD BO2 that is very very cheap from the developers to just re use the old engine
waaaa. lol you could just ignore it, and it's a review, they should mention all modes/options in a game.
@BlueShark1 YES OFC they should mention all game modes, but nobody buys the game for the single player only, honestly when I buy a new fps (focused on the multiplayer) I dont even test the singleplayer. they should mention that its the same s%th as last year and that this game is VERY focused on the casual "gamers"
1 Like Chris Watters - :) Thanks for remembering us "lone wolves" as you call it that play these games. Spec Ops is the best part of this game. Campaign was disappointing and very short.
Agreed. Pretty bad when an additional feature is the best part of any game. I hear the mp is a campfest, the campaign is very short and unimpressive, even more so given the game's price.
1 Like MW3 need more graphic , weapons costumisation in campain and more.but i love the game
2 Like why do people say mw3 has only campers? out of all games i play for multiplayer (cs source,tf2,halo reach,bf3,mw3,bad company 2,killzone 3 etc) mw3 and tf2 have the lowest number of campers bf3 and way way more campers but nobody sais enything
1 Like This game was designed for cowards and guys who pee sitting down. You spend too much time running around looking for people because 2/3 of the team is camping and hiding in corners. I just never could understand how someone can enjoy their $60 investment staying in one spot. Not for me.
2 Like Objectively speaking this is a tight and polished package with plenty of content, in fact my only issue with the game was that all the maps right out of the box were very very small with limited sight lines, this along with the strong feeling of familiarity made me trade it in within a week of buying it. Honestly, if they brought Highrise back I would go right back to the store and buy back the copy I traded in.
@GhostofWar75 depends, if get a time runing in veteran, you will have to open fire like a crazy, but anyways with patience becomes easy.
1 Like @codenameaf7 Well, I don't know then man. I mean if you can give an analytical breakdown of a video game like that and have so many negative points to share, maybe the game isn't really all that great. I don't give these games much thought and I'm totally oblivious to the problems you listed, so it doesn't sully the fun I have with the game. Bottom line is, the less thought you give virtual experiences like MW3, the more enjoyable they are. Try it out.
1 Like @stevieko5454 look at the rank he was at on the points you brought up in the video. He playtested it for a half an hour at best. Go check Metacritic's PC user review average and see what it really deserves and why. This may be a graphical "upgrade" for console users -- for PC though, it still barely qualifies for DLC which I wouldn't consider paying a penny more than £10 tops. Also since it's multiplayer alone that makes the game even worth that amount (unless you're a pre-pubescent kid who's still into GI Joe or something), it makes the PC version worthless, since: 1. most of the aimbotters from MW2 are now on MW3 (some wallhackers switched too, but most are still in MW2, since even the hackers think MW3 sucks) 2. lag compensation still punishes people by slowing down the game to some guy's dial-up connection, which breaks a game 9 times out of 10 3. dedicated servers still useless, as mentioned before 4. they've gone backwards by cutting out various perks and attachments that were there even in MW2 -- i'd rather have servers with custom rules on these, just like MW1 5. they've still yet to milk the PC version with worthless map packs (maybe they will port maps from COD3 this time?) There's a reason why COD4 still gets played so much, even by people who own MW3.
3 Like a few million teenage kids who just hit puberty bought this game, if a gamer wants a real challenge of a shooter than they know which game to buy...
@shadenet89 Yeah Exactly! if u want a real challange of a shooter then get CS 1.6, Unreal Tournament 2004, COD 2, COD 4 Pro Mod or a Quake game.
everybody who know what a real FPS game is knows that the new COD games is only focused on the casual players :P they arnt even Esports, any kid can play it. I dont play FPS games very often and I can just jump in and get a long killstreak no problem
2 Like Battlefield 3 is better than this imho. So realistic. Shooting isnt that easy as MW3 making it much more realistic.
1 Like @Mroowka then WHY did you buy it for computer? srsly that is the dumbest complaint ever -.-
