Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsWrestling Games Discussion Forum › WWE or TNA..............

Greetings Genre fans! You have entered a GameSpot game board dedicated to a specific genre.

- Follow the Terms of Use
- Conceal all plot spoilers or label discussion with spoiler alert.
- Discussions with the intent to disrupt the experience of the board will be considered a forum invasion.

WWE or TNA..............

Forum Actions
  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 124
    Jul 25, 2012 1:27 pm GMT

    i like both of them ...but now a days WWE is too predictable.....TNA seems to be unpredictable and realistic then WWE ....which one you will vote for ??????????

    i like both of them ...but now a days WWE is too predictable.....TNA seems to be unpredictable and realistic then WWE ....which one you will vote for ??????????

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 227
    Jul 26, 2012 2:43 am GMT
    WWE ,as like it as earlier and TNA is doing so much better with their performance , improving the stunts etc.
    so, my vote goes to TNA.
    WWE ,as like it as earlier and TNA is doing so much better with their performance , improving the stunts etc. so, my vote goes to TNA.
  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 227
    Jul 26, 2012 2:46 am GMT
    It is better to see TNA instead of liking CM Punk in WWE
    It is better to see TNA instead of liking CM Punk in WWE
  • Level 2
    Journeyman
    Posts: 49
    Aug 10, 2012 12:44 am GMT
    WWE ofc..
    WWE ofc..
  • Level 30
    Wicked Sick!
    Posts: 21203
    Aug 13, 2012 8:58 am GMT
    WWE since that's where CM Punk is wrestling, TNA will never catch up to the WWE.

    WWE since that's where CM Punk is wrestling, TNA will never catch up to the WWE.
  • Level 40
    Abobo
    Posts: 2351
    User is Online
    Aug 21, 2012 10:40 am GMT

    TNA. I watched WWE from 1998 to 2010 and saw the product rot. Beside better quality matches and content, the main reason I support TNA because the only way the industry as a whole is going to get better is if there is someone else to give the WWE direct competition.

    P.S. I've been watching TNA since 2003 (back when it was ppv only) and its come a mightly long way.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PSN Gamercards

    TNA. I watched WWE from 1998 to 2010 and saw the product rot. Beside better quality matches and content, the main reason I support TNA because the only way the industry as a whole is going to get better is if there is someone else to give the WWE direct competition.

    P.S. I've been watching TNA since 2003 (back when it was ppv only) and its come a mightly long way.

  • Level 2
    Journeyman
    Posts: 8
    Aug 22, 2012 2:33 am GMT
    I would prefer WWE because it is very popular among gamers and there are so so many layers who play online. In fact WWE has more option in gameplay. Check on YOUTUBE and you will find the best answer.
    I would prefer WWE because it is very popular among gamers and there are so so many layers who play online. In fact WWE has more option in gameplay. Check on YOUTUBE and you will find the best answer.
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 15756
    User is Online
    Aug 26, 2012 6:29 pm GMT

    WWE. Since I was a kid. I can't like TNA for some reason.

    Sig by SteverXIII.

    DeadMan

    WWE. Since I was a kid. I can't like TNA for some reason.

  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 15756
    User is Online
    Aug 26, 2012 6:31 pm GMT

    WWE. Since I was a kid. I can't like TNA for some reason.

    Sig by SteverXIII.

    DeadMan

    WWE. Since I was a kid. I can't like TNA for some reason.

  • Level 12
    Rad Racer
    Posts: 3
    Aug 30, 2012 1:04 pm GMT
    I'd have to go with TNA for various reasons, including:

    -They're not afraid to show blood, whereas WWE cameramen go out of their way to cover up even the slightest laceration. It's not like limbs are being mutilated

    -More "hardcore" elements in TNA. Seeing even just one chair-shot in WWE is a treat

    -TNAs PPVs have more entertainment value than WWEs

    -Much better roster than WWEs. I'll take Jeff Hardy and AJ Styles over John Cena and Big Show any day of the week

    -Better commentary. The only thing that would make the commentator team better is if Joey Styles joined.

    I could go on forever, but I don't think GameSpot would be very impressed.
    Edited on Aug 30, 2012 1:08 pm GMT
    I'd have to go with TNA for various reasons, including: -They're not afraid to show blood, whereas WWE cameramen go out of their way to cover up even the slightest laceration. It's not like limbs are being mutilated -More "hardcore" elements in TNA. Seeing even just one chair-shot in WWE is a treat -TNAs PPVs have more entertainment value than WWEs -Much better roster than WWEs. I'll take Jeff Hardy and AJ Styles over John Cena and Big Show any day of the week -Better commentary. The only thing that would make the commentator team better is if Joey Styles joined. I could go on forever, but I don't think GameSpot would be very impressed. :P
  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 3334
    User is Online
    Sep 12, 2012 6:15 pm GMT

    I like WWE better. At the moment I think WWE has some good storylines with Kane & Daniel Bryan, CM Punk joining Paul Heyman and finally turning heel, Cody Rhodes turning on The Miz.

    As for TNA I just find it hard getting into it.

    I like WWE better. At the moment I think WWE has some good storylines with Kane & Daniel Bryan, CM Punk joining Paul Heyman and finally turning heel, Cody Rhodes turning on The Miz.

    As for TNA I just find it hard getting into it.

  • Level 16
    Magician Lord
    Posts: 128
    Sep 19, 2012 6:34 am GMT

    I think WWE is better than TNA... I have played TNA and SV 2011 and 2007 and i liked SVR series more... Lets hope WWE 13 gives a better show than previous versions..

    Ishan Pathak

    Rated R Superstar

    I think WWE is better than TNA... I have played TNA and SV 2011 and 2007 and i liked SVR series more... Lets hope WWE 13 gives a better show than previous versions..

  • Level 1
    Player
    Posts: 3
    Oct 7, 2012 1:50 pm GMT
    Hm... WWE has better matches, TNA has better stunts and more impressive moves.

    But my vote goes to WWE
    Hm... WWE has better matches, TNA has better stunts and more impressive moves. But my vote goes to WWE
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 217
    User is Online
    Oct 21, 2012 5:16 pm GMT
    WWE, its more entertaining than TNA. TNA is entertaining too but still WWE is better.

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Follow me on Twitter and I will follow you back

    https://twitter.com/KevinB_WWE

    WWE, its more entertaining than TNA. TNA is entertaining too but still WWE is better.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 24576
    User is Online
    Nov 11, 2012 4:13 pm GMT

    TNA right now.

    I watch them both but since late 2009 WWE has been pretty bad with the exception of a few storylines that started good, but did nothing in the end.

    Wiiu ID: despa1r_fact0r

    TNA right now.

    I watch them both but since late 2009 WWE has been pretty bad with the exception of a few storylines that started good, but did nothing in the end.

  • Level 2
    Journeyman
    Posts: 2
    Nov 30, 2012 8:20 pm GMT
    W W E game is very nice & I am always enjoyed the game. My favorite Player is john chena. This player fight really good & he is good fighter. I like it W W E. Thanks You. new vitality
    W W E game is very nice & I am always enjoyed the game. My favorite Player is john chena. This player fight really good & he is good fighter. I like it W W E. Thanks You. [url=http://www.squidoo.com/new-vitality] new vitality [/url]
  • Level 4
    Paper Boy
    Posts: 13
    Dec 2, 2012 11:13 pm GMT
    While most people will vote for WWE...

    I'll vote for the underdog... TNA because if they havn't died by now, I don't think they will die off anytime soon. They are standing up to the big dog, WWE and surviving purely on better wrestling and the unpredictable element that you mentioned. I do watch both as well, but WWE seems to be a step behind TNA to the point that WWE is currently copying at least three of TNA's storylines...

    1.) CM Punk's title reign count & respect storyline - Originally Bobby Roode was counting his title reign has a heel and clearly the "RESPECT" storyline belongs to Main Event Mafia.

    2.) The Shield - They may be good, but its clearly a ripple effect caused by Aces & Eights. WWE's creative team seems to enjoy watching TNA quite a bit.

    3.) AJ/Cena Affair - Well, this is a complete rip off of AJ Styles/Lynch storyline so much that I cannot believe WWE went forward with it because TNA's version was much better with the TV14 material.

    Therefore, once again, I'll vote for TNA who is obviously setting the standards.
    While most people will vote for WWE... I'll vote for the underdog... TNA because if they havn't died by now, I don't think they will die off anytime soon. They are standing up to the big dog, WWE and surviving purely on better wrestling and the unpredictable element that you mentioned. I do watch both as well, but WWE seems to be a step behind TNA to the point that WWE is currently copying at least three of TNA's storylines... 1.) CM Punk's title reign count & respect storyline - Originally Bobby Roode was counting his title reign has a heel and clearly the "RESPECT" storyline belongs to Main Event Mafia. 2.) The Shield - They may be good, but its clearly a ripple effect caused by Aces & Eights. WWE's creative team seems to enjoy watching TNA quite a bit. 3.) AJ/Cena Affair - Well, this is a complete rip off of AJ Styles/Lynch storyline so much that I cannot believe WWE went forward with it because TNA's version was much better with the TV14 material. Therefore, once again, I'll vote for TNA who is obviously setting the standards.
Forum Actions
ForumsWrestling Games Discussion Forum › WWE or TNA..............