So if a company refuses to buy "conflict minerals," that improves something, somehow? The solution to third-world killing is to remove any value from their natural resources? I guess the theory is that, if nothing they have is worth anything, they'll stop killing each other over it, and settle down to peacefully starve to death when their economy collapses. Great idea, western progressives, you'll save the world yet.
Nintendo worst in 'conflict minerals' survey
Research from The Enough Project places House of Mario behind Apple, Microsoft, Sony in reporting, acting on procurement of materials from Congo.
Nintendo has come in last in a survey of efforts to investigate "conflict minerals" in electronics industry giants for the second year in a row. The Enough Project's ranking of 24 companies placed Apple in 9th place, Microsoft in 10th, and Sony in 17th. Each company was rated on its compliance with international standards and efforts to clearly identify and hold accountable suppliers of the minerals used in consumer electronics, many of which are extracted in Congo amid armed violence and human rights violations.
The Enough Project's rankings alleged that Nintendo has been unresponsive to its outreach and "has not undertaken any known efforts to investigate its supply chains." Nintendo and Taiwanese phone-and-tablet manufacturer HTC were the only two companies to not give any comment in the report's detailed responses section.
Nintendo responded to the rankings in a statement to GameSpot, saying the company audits its practices and those of its suppliers. Nintendo began outlining its procurement guidelines in 2008. "We expect that our production partners comply with these guidelines, which are based on relevant laws, international standards, and guidelines that focus on protecting human rights, ensuring workplace safety, promoting corporate ethics, and safeguarding the environment," Nintendo said.
While Nintendo's most recent corporate social responsibility report says the company asks its production partners to respond to regular surveys and undergo on-site inspections, it does not reference specific binding agreements. By comparison, Microsoft's 2011 citizenship report explicitly stated its suppliers must follow a vendor code of conduct.
Content you might like…
Users who looked at this article also looked at these content items.
Hot Stories
Newsmakers
-
Preowned games on Xbox One decided by publisher
Microsoft confirms that it won't charge any fees for any titles eligible for resale. Full Story
- Posted Jun 7, 2013 7:00 am SST
-
Microsoft confirms required 24-hour check-in for Xbox One
Playing Xbox One games on somebody else's console will also require a check-in every hour. Full Story
- Posted Jun 7, 2013 6:41 am SST
Featured Stories
-
PlayStation 4 will cost $399
Sony confirms a $399/€399/£349 price for the PlayStation 4 hardware, $100 cheaper than Microsoft's Xbox One. Full Story
- Posted Jun 11, 2013 2:19 pm SST
-
New Halo coming to Xbox One; runs at 60fps
Will be coming in 2014. Full Story
- Posted Jun 11, 2013 2:11 am SST
-
Del Toro calls BioShock Infinite a 'mindf*ck'
Pan's Labyrinth director praises Ken Levine and Irrational Games for latest BioShock, says he would consider large-scale Pacific Rim game "God willing." Full Story
- Posted Jun 13, 2013 11:53 pm SST
-
Microsoft: Xbox One will be leading product people love and embrace
Xbox boss Don Mattrick believes concerns over connectivity are overblown, recommends Xbox 360 for those without an Internet connection. Full Story
- Posted Jun 12, 2013 8:52 am SST
-
New Mirror's Edge is open-world
EA Labels boss Frank Gibeau describes new project as "open-world action adventure game." Full Story
- Posted Jun 13, 2013 1:45 am SST







