Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
3Oct 12

Still thinking about Resident Evil and the review fallout. Just saw Giant Bomb's review, which is 2/5 stars. That equates to a 4.0. GameSpot as we all know gave the game a 4.5, and Destructiod gave it a 3. A quick glance at the Metacritic shows RE6 to be at a 66, but a closer look reveals that although there are a lot of positive scores (22), there are also a lot of mixed scores (21) and five bad scores, which definitely has dragged the overall score down.

But, let's take a look at the really low scores:

  • 4.5/10 - GameSpot
  • 2/5 - GiantBomb
  • 4/10 - Polygon (never herad of this one)
  • 3/10 - Destructoid
  • 1/5 - Quarter to Three (yeah, never heard of this one either)

So as it turns out, when it comes to the red scores, GameSpot is the highest. Doesn't quite seem so bad now, does it? But these five scores illustrate something: there is something wrong with the game. If there wasn't, these sources couldn't be able to objectively write about them, and this in turn raises the question: Why aren't the glowing reviews NOT writing about them?

I would put more stock into someone who has mixed feelings or just ends up hating the game more than someone who is dumbfoundly impressed by it. It's the former that usually has more interesting things to say, because someone who is being more critical tends to assess, anazlye and see things than someone who is more relaxed at playing and reviewing games. There's the kind of reviewer who forgives too much and thus everything is 8s, 9s, and 10s, and usually does a disservice to his readers. As for the readers....

It's easy to see why so many gamers are upset. You get 22 positive reviews, but 5 really bad ones. Yet, people simply don't want to acknlowedge the negative reviews and focus soley on the positive. Is it because they're afraid they'll read something in the review that will bother them while playing and not like the game? They were looking forward to this and went out and spent good money on the game and they just want to enjoy it. They want to read positive reviews and see high scores to reaffirm that they made a good purchase with RE6. In that case, stay off the internet. Don't log onto GS. Don't look at the Metacritic. Don't watch video reviews.

Now, this has been going on for a long time with long-running franchises. It seems that it's almost expected for a game to automatically do well. Case in point: The Legend of Zelda. Just because it's a Zelda game, it automatically means that each game released should be a 9.0 or higher and damn everyone else who thinks differently! 7.5 for Skyward Sword anyone? How about 8.8 for Twilight Princess? I love Zelda games, but even I had a hard time with Skyward Sword, and I liked the game less than Tom McShea did. I gave it a 6.5, and I view the game as the worst Zelda released by Nintendo. But, I'm in the minority, so my opinion doesn't matter.

I do believe it does, though. I believe that gamers who don't automatically give scores out of fandom for the franchise are more honest and interesting than those who give free passes. There are reasons why we are mentioning negative problems with these games, not to be jerks about it to piss off fans, but because they exist. They exist either out of problems that have never been addressed, or as new problems from the results of quirky game design decisions, but they're there. Even though we think our opinions have some importance, though, they're still merely opinions. If you want to love a game unconditionally, that is your right, and then you also shouldn't let our opinions bother you.

So the majority rules, and this results in mob mentality and behavior. When someone speaks against the majority, they are met with resitance and hostility. And for what? A difference of opinion. The gaming community cannot be taken seriously until these oversentive gamers stop acting like whiny self-entitled elitists. You might also find yourself in denial, knowing you bought a stinker, but since everyone else around you is having fun with it, it simply MUST be good. One of my favorite quotes is by William Shakespeare: "To thine own self be true." If you want to be of the majority, make sure you really do feel the way you do about the game, because if you lie to yourself, the majority rules over you. It's okay to admit that Resident Evil 6 sucks if you think it sucks. This is why I appreciate GameSpot; they call it like they see it, and they can give a flying fu ck if you disagree.

32 comments
Rheinmetal
Rheinmetal

GameSpot, despite its many problems, is a trustworthy site when it comes to reviews. I admit it. I never felt that they are "deceiving" me in some way with their reviews. Even when my first reaction was negative, if they bashed some favourite game of mine, a month later after I have played the game myself I would come back and give a similar, or lower score.

Now, regarding RE 6. I have played the demo, I can't say I was especially thrilled with it, but didn't give me the impression of a 4/10, or 5/10 game either. Eventually I will play it myself in the not so near future, as a loyal (read: victim) RE fan.

swyg
swyg

The one key ingredient that gets people to buy a game is interest.  Now what garners that interest could be anything: the company who makes the game, the genre type, online community, reviews, word of mouth etc.. but the point is it doesn't matter how a person gets interested in it, the point is that they have to be interested in it somehow. By themselves, all of the ways a game can interest a gamer are full of peaks and valleys, and there's no absolute or definitive way to say how a person judges a game to buy. For instance, It probably won't matter if the reviews are low to a gamer if they had their sights set on a game for a long time.  Even if it disappoints them in the long run, what really gets people buying games is whether or not they care about the product.  Likewise, a game could get astounding reviews and is liked by so many, but to another gamer they just don't care because the game doesn't offer what they're interested in.

Zonno
Zonno

There are, of course, always some obscure review sites or magazines which throw out gruesome low scores for the sake of wanting to be either 'critical' or 'radical'. However, a critical review doesn't mean the game gets torn to pieces and served off with a negative or mediocre score in general. It's mainly a exposition of various arguments interpreted from a philosophy on how games are supposed to be like. This can certainly result in a very high score or a positive verdict.

 

But, I believe you're right as for the RE6 reviews for which many reviewers can't even find any arguments to praise it with and still stamp it with an absurd high score. I read a couple of 'critic' reviews and the bottom line was that RE6 has 'varied gameplay', 'a new direction', 'more action' and 'a lot of content' which sounds interesting, until you realize it means nothing.

gix47
gix47

different scores for different platforms, if you look at the ps3 on Metacritic it has a 76 and only one Negative score. Everything you based this blog on was a score for the xbox360 and gamespot gave the same review for both systems or i should say they gave the ps3 review the same review from the xbox360.

Icefur89
Icefur89 like.author.displayName 1 Like

I am glad someone has given a write up with the detail to inform everyone why it is that so many people have an issue with the direction that resident evil has taken, not just within gaming but within the film industry. All I see are dollar signs wherever  a game attempts to package a movie like experience with realistic graphics. There is nothing wrong with making money, the world runs this way, and success pushes us all forward, but, sometimes we forget why we aim to push forwards, thus treading far from the original track. Gaming will always attempt to create a new experience as technology is so closely intertwined with its makeup, as gamers we need to decide whether this new experience is a step forward or backward?

Elann2008
Elann2008 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Well written blog.  I couldn't agree more, good man.

MR_TUBBy
MR_TUBBy

Well written good sir/mam, Well said!  That is unless the majority disagrees with you, in which I say "BOOOOOOOO, U NO CAN RITE GUD ATALL I DISSGREE!"  (I go where the majority tells me to go or I get slapped for disobeying).But in all seriousness, I enjoyed your post and wish more people were a little more level-headed with reviews.  A few numbers from ANY reviewer is not going to suddenly change the product.  It is what it is.  Alas, this is the internet though and brave buffoons as well as terrible trolls are a dime a dozen.

Armoured_Mage
Armoured_Mage like.author.displayName 1 Like

i tried the demo for re6, i dont think i could beat the game with that camera, it was horrible.

WCK619
WCK619

Quarter to Three's review is probably by Tom Chick, who's (in)famous for giving low scores.

jcknapier711
jcknapier711

I never trust any reviews, whether good or bad.  I simply look at a few images of the gameplay and I'll know whether or not I'll like the game.  This method has always worked for me.

The_Deepblue
The_Deepblue like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

One just has to play the game for himself and, in the meantime, be able to appreciate the opinions of others. I gave Skyward Sword a ten out of ten, never bashed McShea. I even thumbed up your review for the game. If the reviewer can competently explain the score in the review, I respect that, and I usually mention those "negative" points in my review to warn reviewers that, while these aspects did not hamper my experience with the game, it may do so for others.

King9999
King9999

You can't just focus on the score; you have to read the content.  I'm waiting for a site to review games and not put a score on it.

mikezer0
mikezer0

 @King9999 Kotaku. They tell you if it is worth of playing or not. According to them, Resident Evil 6 is not worth playing. No score involved.

King9999
King9999

 @mikezer0 Ah, so there are sites that do this, that's good.  I don't like Kotaku, so I won't go there.

ch35dlgl
ch35dlgl

i think they are too harsh on re6

BravoOneActual
BravoOneActual

I think their institutional "Flying F*ck" policy extends to 99% of whatever we think, good, bad or indifferent.

 

The remaining 1% gets allotted to the return of the soapbox -- which I'm guessing is back simply because they couldn't take the incessant bitching anymore.

 

Congratulations on being featured, just the same.

 

 

JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

 @BravoOneActual So that's what the AWESOME USER BLOGS thing is?  The new Soap Box?  Oh, cool.  I've been trying to get featured in that thing for years. 

Setho10
Setho10 like.author.displayName 1 Like

I agree. Just because some entries in a series are great doesn't mean other entries should get a free pass. judge a game on its own merits not the merits of previous entries in the same series. I played the demo earlier and I got light headed from the awful framerate and broken camera. Now maybe they improved those things in the final game but that doesn't seem to be the case. That alone was enough to make me not want to play the game again. If the rest of the criticisms about the game are true as well then I think a low score is pretty justified.

TAMKFan
TAMKFan

Yeah, I have disagreed with a fair share of professional reviews in the past, but you don't see me making a big deal out of it.

GAMECAMILLER
GAMECAMILLER

The game community it just too sensitive either way. When a site/reviewer reviews any game, I expect them to be honest. If they really think the game is good or bad, they should not falter on their opinion just because others think otherwise.

Pierst179
Pierst179 moderator moderator

That sure is a big difference between GS and other outlets.

Danu_06
Danu_06

Actually i think people is very sensitive with the reviews and overstimate their value. In my case I just check reviews to figure out which game buy first or what kind of things I can expect from the game.

I just dont feel the urge to defend a series or company. When Dark Souls got a higher score than Skyrim this site was a constant flame war. The gamer community is a shame in this issue.

 

 

q-bert39
q-bert39

 @Danu_06 Well to be fair, skyrim is not in the same league as dark souls. Apples to oranges w/e you want, some games are just better than others.

homegirl2180
homegirl2180

But there is that obvious other side of the argument that the negative reviews could be focused on something that most fans won't find relevant. I'm not going to deny that overly hyped games tend to skew towards a higher score (from what I've seen), unless there's a lot legitimately wrong with the game. That said though, I've read negative reviews that I've completely disagreed with. "X was boring" when I thought X was one of the best things about the game.

Swanogt19
Swanogt19

I couldn't agree with you more! 

nunchuk28
nunchuk28

Wait...people would seriously by blind enough by their fanatism to not be able to recognise flaws on their games? Now that's just having bias. Well written blog lucas, if someone really cares for a game they'll get it regardless of its critical reception and form their own opinion rather than rely on others. I suppose fans are just stupid when it comes to accepting others thoughts

Icefur89
Icefur89

 @nunchuk28 Let them waste time with such a fabulous game design, hahaha its their loss not ours. Think of fashion and art, people have good taste and bad taste, it all depends on their own makeup as a person. We need people to love this game otherwise it wouldn't be so much fun to criticize its many flaws! 

shadowysea07
shadowysea07

 @nunchuk28 funny thing the fans of the game your icon is from are horrible when people point out problems p3 had.

Conversation powered by Livefyre